WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Super Rugby: playoffs picture clears but system raises questionsHong, Young lead Stanford men's gymnastics to 5th consecutive national titleJennifer Aniston, 55, and Courteney Cox, 59, show off their ageRuins of 3,000Stalin's lost city: Inside the crumbling remains of onceIsrael's parliament passes amended budget as Gaza war continuesGigi and Bella Hadid's PalestinianCucho, Moreira score goals to help Crew play Timbers to 2Jeremy Clarkson leads emotional tributes as BBC Top Gear legend dies aged 80Ryan Garcia knocks Devin Haney down 3 times and hands his amateur rival his first pro loss
1.9785s , 6499.28125 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property ,Cosmic Chronicle news portal